OBJECTIVE: To assess if a change in physical activity occurred after a one-year weight loss period on either liraglutide or placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight.

METHOD: This is secondary analysis of a one-year weight loss trial, with participants randomised (1:1) to either liraglutide 3 ​mg/day or placebo. The main outcome was change in physical activity (min/day) after one year assessed by accelerometer. Physical function was assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), function subscale with 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating extreme disability. Analyses were done on the modified intention to treat population defined as complete baseline accelerometer data.

RESULTS: A total of 135 participants were analysed (66 liraglutide; 69 placebo). Daily physical activity time did not change in either group (liraglutide: 15.8 ​min/day; placebo: 14.2 ​min/day; mean difference 1.6 ​min/day (95%CI -16 to 19; P ​= ​0.90)). The liraglutide group lost -4.1 ​kg more than placebo (95% CI -6.0 to -2.1; P ​< ​0.0001) and improved in KOOS function 3.8 points more than placebo (95% CI 0.9 to 6.7; P ​= ​0.01).

CONCLUSION: Despite better outcomes on body weight and self-reported physical functioning liraglutide did not induce changes in physical activity over one year in individuals with knee OA.

BACKGROUND: The treatments for trochanteric fractures try to regain early mobility and limit morbidity and risk of reoperations. The most currently used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and the proximal femoral nail (PFN) are both with pros and cons. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of these interventions for trochanteric fractures by evaluating the surgical performance and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register were searched for RCTs comparing DHS and PFN for trochanteric fractures. All selected studies and the risk of bias were assessed. Clinical data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, successful closed reduction and complications like nonunion, implant failure and reoperation were recorded. Random-effects models were used in Review Manager software, and GRADE was applied for the interpretation of the evidence.

RESULTS: From 286 identified trials, twelve RCTs including 1889 patients were eligible for inclusion; six RCTs directly comparing DHS with PFN, while other six compared DHS with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Compared to DHS, PFN had shorter operative time and led to less intraoperative blood loss. However, DHS need less intraoperative fluoroscopy time than PFN. No difference was seen for the achievement of closed reduction. For risk of postoperative complications, no difference was seen between PFN and DHS for non-union, risk of implant failure and revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: PFN(A) resulted in a shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss compared to DHS. However, no difference was seen for postoperative complications. Trial registration PROSPERO: CRD42021239974.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a clinical syndrome that arises due to age-related decline, diseases, malnutrition and lifestyle. Two major perspectives on frailty exists: frailty as a phenotype and frailty as an accumulation of deficits. The two types are measured by Fried's Phenotype (FP) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate which model best predicts 90-day mortality in elderly patients acutely admitted to an emergency department in Denmark.

METHODS: This study comprised a prospective cohort with the following inclusion criteria: age > 65 years, acute admission and admission >24 h. Bispebjerg Hospital, Odense University Hospital and Hospital of Southwest Jutland participated in the study. The FP and the CFS were measured in all patients. Descriptive statistics, relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), risk difference and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed. The outcome was 90-day mortality.

RESULTS: A total of 1,030 patients participated (mean age: 78.2 years, 54% female). Among these, 221 were frail by the FP (score > 3) and 555 participants were frail by the CFS (score > 5). Within 90 days, 128 died. The analyses revealed significant associations between frailty and 90-day mortality. For the FP, the RR was 2.67 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93-3.69), p less-than 0.001; and for the CFS, the RR was 4.12 (95% CI: 2.65-6.42), p less-than 0.001. The adjusted OR for the CFS was 4.38 (95% CI: 2.68-7.13); for the FP, 3.88 (95% CI: 2.51-6.01).

CONCLUSION: A significant association existed between frailty and 90-day mortality in the Danish cohort. However, the CFS is a better predictor of 90-day mortality the FP. Even so, the CFS still has a lack of sensitivity and specificity.

FUNDING: none TRIAL REGISTRATION. not relevant.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the feasibility of computer-assisted quantification of joint pathologies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis by evaluating the published data on reliability, validity, and feasibility.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for original articles published from January 1, 1985, to January 1, 2021. We selected studies in which patients with inflammatory arthritis were enrolled, and arthritis-related structural damage/synovitis in peripheral joints was assessed on non-contrast-enhanced, contrast-enhanced (CE), or dynamic CE (DCE)-MRI using (semi)automated methods. Data were pooled using random-effects model.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies consisting of 1342 MRIs were included (mean age, 54.8 years; 66.7% female; duration of arthritis, 3.6 years). Among clinical/laboratory factors, synovial membrane volume (SV) was moderately correlated with erthrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level (P < 0.01). Pooled analysis showed an overall excellent intra- and inter-reader reliability for computer-aided quantification of bone erosion volume (BEV; r = 0.97 [95% CI: 0.92-0.99], 0.93 [0.87-0.97]), SV (r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.90-0.99], 0.86 [0.78-0.91]), and DCE-MRI perfusion parameters (r = 0.96-0.99). Meta-regression showed that computer-aided and manual methods provide comparable reliability (P > 0.05). Computer-aided measurement of BEV (r = 0.92), SV (r = 0.82), and DCE-MRI biomarkers (r = 0.72 N-total; r = 0.74 N-plateau; r = 0.64 N-washout) were significantly correlated with the Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS; P < 0.01), allowing for earlier assessment of drug efficacy. On average, (semi)automated analysis of BEV/SV took 17 minutes (vs. 9 minutes for the RAMRIS) and DCE-MRI took 4 minutes (vs. 33 minutes for manual assessment).

CONCLUSION: Computer-aided image quantification technologies demonstrate excellent reliability and validity when used to quantify MRI pathologies of peripheral joints in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Computer-aided evaluation of inflammatory arthritis is an emerging field and should be considered as a viable complement to conventional observer-based scoring methods for clinical trials application.